The verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity is determined by which party?

The determination of a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity can indeed involve both the judge and the jury. In a criminal trial, the jury typically assesses the evidence presented and determines the factual questions, such as whether the defendant committed the act in question and whether they meet the legal standards for insanity at the time of the offense.

However, the judge plays a crucial role as well, especially in instructing the jury on the legal standards for insanity and the implications of their findings. In some jurisdictions, the judge may also make the final determination regarding the application of the insanity defense based on the jury's verdict.

Therefore, the verdict can result from the contributions of both the jury, which weighs the evidence, and the judge, who ensures that the legal standards are correctly applied. This dual involvement reflects the complexities of the legal system and the importance of accurately assessing both the facts of the case and the applicable laws surrounding insanity defenses.