What role has forensic science recently been recognized to play in addition to prosecutorial efforts?

Forensic science has increasingly been recognized as a vital tool in reconciliation efforts following war and mass violence. This role involves using scientific methods to help document human rights abuses, identify victims, and provide evidence in transitional justice processes. By applying forensic techniques, practitioners can gather and preserve evidence of atrocities, which can be crucial for acknowledging the truth of events that have occurred during conflicts. This aided in building a case for accountability, addressing grievances, and facilitating healing within communities affected by violence.

In contrast, the other options pertain to legal and judicial processes rather than reconciliation. For instance, jury nullification relates to a jury's ability to acquit a defendant despite evidence of guilt, which does not directly involve forensic science. Peremptory challenges refer to the rights of lawyers to reject certain jurors without reason, impacting jury composition but not forensic investigation. Witness tampering involves illicit actions to influence or intimidate testimony and falls outside the constructive and restorative approach of forensic science in reconciliation. Thus, the unique capacity of forensic science to contribute to peace-building and acknowledgment of historical injustices makes its role in reconciliation efforts particularly significant.