Which legal reform theory focuses on the impact of legal actions on individual well-being?

The correct answer is therapeutic jurisprudence, which is a legal theory that emphasizes the law’s role in promoting the psychological and emotional well-being of individuals involved in the legal system. This approach considers how legal processes and decisions affect the mental health and overall well-being of individuals, rather than viewing the law merely as a system of rules.

Therapeutic jurisprudence seeks to understand how legal structures, practices, and procedures can enhance the psychological and emotional health of individuals. It promotes the idea that the law can be used as a tool for healing and resolving personal and social issues, thus properly aligning legal outcomes with the best interests of individuals and communities.

In contrast, other options, such as general systems theory, focus on understanding complex systems and their interrelations rather than individual emotional outcomes. Complexity theory delves into understanding systems that exhibit unpredictable behaviors due to their intricate interdependencies, also not directly focusing on individual well-being. Therapeutic intervention relates to specific actions taken in a therapeutic context but does not encapsulate the broader legal implications on health and wellness that therapeutic jurisprudence addresses.