Which method in jury selection helps to temper bias?

The method that helps to temper bias during jury selection is the peremptory challenge. This approach allows attorneys to exclude potential jurors from the panel without providing a specific reason. Its purpose is to ensure that both sides can remove jurors they believe may harbor biases or prejudices that could affect their judgment. This process helps to create a more balanced and impartial jury, as attorneys can use their observations and instincts about juror attitudes and backgrounds to promote fairness in the trial.

Jury nullification involves the jury's ability to disregard the law and acquit a defendant even when the evidence suggests guilt, which is not a method of selecting jurors. Jury randomization refers to selecting jurors in a random manner, which can also help reduce bias but does not specifically address the attorneys' ability to remove biased jurors. Jury dismissal generally refers to discharging a juror for various reasons but does not offer the same strategic advantages to the parties involved in the selection process as peremptory challenges do.